Jon Garvey published the first book-length response to Joshua Swamidass’ The Genealogical Adam and Eve, a theological case for people outside the garden.
Does genetics challenge a single-couple origin to humanity? William Lane Craig explains how we found that this challenge was an illusion.
Madeume’s objections do not challenge Swamidass’ key thesis: a traditional, literal reading of Scripture does not rule out people outside the Garden.
John W. Hilber explains how Relevance Theory clarifies the meaning of text, by clarifying what is implicated vs. incidental to the message.
The dialogue between PS and RTB is live streamed on January 18th, as we consider The Genealogical Adam and Eve alongside their model of human origins.
Nathan Lents, a secular biologist, published in USA Today his reasons for endorsing The Genealogical Adam and Eve. This created a small social media storm.
Darrel Falk, “People like me, stuck in a specific genetic paradigm, were wrong.” The humility of our scholars opens a better way forward for everyone.
IVP Academic has been encouraged to see the truly unique, communal development process that Josh has embraced for this project.
With important questions before, us how should we approach origins? Let’s keep working at this with our eyes focused, not on Adam and Eve, but on Jesus.
Just like us, C. S. Lewis encountered challenges from science. Rather than falling into unending arguments, he found a better way.
© 2020 Peaceful Science. Built using WordPress and Mesmerize Theme.
[ Placeholder content for popup link ]
WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin