The next two articles from the ETS session on the GAE are important. Richard Averbeck, a renown biblical scholar, explains why he left young earth creationism, not because of science, but because of Scripture.
Andrew Loke, the philosopher, responds to Drs. John Sanford, Rob Carter and Hans Madueme. These authors missed some important basic facts, and its showing in their responses to The Genealogical Adam and Eve.
On the surface, the origins debate is a conflict between evolution and creation. But, on a fundamental level, it is really about the grand questions of what it means to be human. Who is God? Who are we? Pause to think about these things with Andrew Walsh.
The biblical text gives us anchor points in our engagement with modern science even though it does not focus on a lot of the concerns that modern scientists have in their work.
The critics misunderstand a highly significant result. This book answers the twelve objections to evolution raised by Wayne Grudem.
Have you ever been shipped off to a military academy as a preteen, only to find it’s an orbital platform with low gravity? How do you find a frame of reference to orient to those new surroundings?
Kamala Khan or Ms Marvel? Light particle or Light wave? Jesus the Son of Man or Jesus the Son of God? Which of these identities are the true ones? They all are.
Jan 4, 2022
Jan 4, 2022
Mar 1, 2022
Apr 19, 2024
Jan 4, 2022
Mar 1, 2022
Apr 19, 2024
