Denis Lamoureux, an evolutionary creationist, found a math error in The Genealogical Adam and Eve. This mistake, and the rest, are corrected in the paperback version of the book.
An old-earth creationist explains how he changed is mind, surveyingthe shifts in young earth arguments over the last 50 years.
This is the history that young earth creationists do not want you to know about.
Four possible models of how humans came to possess their unique traits, in an imaginative old earth creationist book.
Want to make your new category of ‘scientists’ stand out? Make them shining beacons of knowledge against a backdrop of flat Earth ignorance—even if you have to invent that too.
In this essay we respond to the comments of Tom McCall, William Lane Craig, and Stephen C. Meyer on mere theistic evolution.
In claiming “fair use” to republish deleted articles, Peaceful Science is not utilizing a “loophole,” but is closely aligned with the constitutional purpose of copyright law.
Exploring what paleontology, archaeology and biology tell us about when our ancestors acquired uniquely human traits.
Murray and Churchill’s paper do an admirable job defending theistic evolution against theological objections.
If Dr. Marcus Ross has any scientific objections to my work, let him to take them up directly with me.
Always check the references; you never know when Washington Irving might be gaslighting you.
Rather than ask, “Can we reconcile orthodox evolutionary theory with orthodox theological commitments?”, I ask: “Should we?”
BioLogos updates their scientific position on Adam and Eve. This is an important step forward and a key milestone in the conversation.
I am a scientist, and I am often asked by my colleagues about evidence I see for the resurrection. This is how I explain it to them.
Evolutionary theory makes sense of cancer, giving us critical insight into how it works. Going the other direction, cancer makes sense of evolution too.
A physicist confesses that the electron is round and that Jesus rose from the dead. My own faith is informed by the evidence, but it is much more.
When I disagree with another scientist, I sometimes respond, In my professional opinion, this just looks 1+1=3 to me. Maybe they took the garden path?
I went public in 2012 on evolution. When it comes to personal risks, very personal reasons take center stage. Why did I go public?
Martin Luther King, Jr. was one of the most impactful theologians of the 20th century, but most Christians have never read his work. Here is how to read him.
I went to Vanderbilt specifically to study the social determinants of health, specifically those related to outcomes of Black birthing folks.
Drawing on the history of ethics in medicine, perhaps Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) could be how we ensure AI is ethical and good.
Pierre Baldi has been applying Deep Learning, a type of AI, to study scientific problems, like protein folding. How is AI impacting science?
Entropy is unavoidable. But that doesn’t mean we have no choice about its consequences and who experiences them.
Have you ever been shipped off to a military academy as a preteen, only to find it’s an orbital platform with low gravity? How do you find a frame of reference to orient to those new surroundings?
